
Lots and lots of options here, friends and countrymen, Lots of options. Quality thinking. There was no decisive victory in any particular camp, which just reminds us of how complex, convoluted, and confusing it is to live in Amanda’s world. Correct us if we’re wrong, but here, in our humble opinions, is the gist of where the brain collective is heading.
Amanda probably didn’t steal the money. As CactusDove and Gemstar said, Amanda may be diabolical, but she is hardly a criminal. Maybe she’s a millionaire as _Amanda_ and fizzy79 first pointed out, but we rather doubt that, too. She just does not really have that sort of entitled attitude.
The money may or may not have been for the mortgage. themidnighter gives some pretty convincing evidence from the book, but we also agree with dem_94 and stella94 that Amanda might have been giving Callie options to see what she’d do with the money. Like a test. Regardless of whether it was meant to pay the man (or the bank), it was definitely meant to keep people together – be that the three of us, like Layla said, or Callie and her dad like pete1994 hypothesizes.
Amanda may not be Amanda’s real name according to Na5na and winter_girl, although it so suits her. We’re also curious if the verdict that you, jury of our peers, have produced is something we should follow: Is Callie’s mom playing financier?
Strawbezz thinks that Ursula found Callie and sent the money as a message to her daughter while FalleN_PeTal thinks it might have been the other way around—Amanda sought out Callie’s mom and asked for help. SarahB has a theory of her own and mandaxoxolove wants to gather more information on Ursula’s disappearance to see if that produces any new leads.
But we just can’t decide. It seems a little far-fetched to think that Ursula and Amanda are partners in crime and yet Callie’s left in the dark.
